Droughts, floods, hurricanes, and fires; it seems like every month a catastrophic weather event is ripping through communities worldwide. Weather disasters from America to India to Australia prompt media outlets to sound the alarm using headlines like “worst in a decade” or “worst in 500 years”! They even stoop so low as to capitalize on death counts for clickbait. Radical leftists in America amplify the fearmongering using their platforms, insisting that every American must ban fossil fuels in favor of electric vehicles (EVs), swelter in the heat by setting their thermostat to 78 degrees during heat waves and consider using insects as a food source to help offset so-called climate change. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), America’s simple-minded sweetheart, along with figures like the pig-tailed teenager Greta Thunberg, have been on the record as alarmists, stating things like “the world will end in twelve years.” Thus, further traumatizing young people across the world. AOC has also made statements about not wanting children due to climate change giving her less-than-clever followers the idea that lack of procreation is beneficial (although this may be beneficial to us).
I always wonder what is in it for them. Are they EV investors? Do they have any financial gain from pushing these “climate crises?” Or were they simply the kids terrified of their shadows who took Earth Day way too seriously in elementary school? My five-year-old loves to pick up trash at the local park to “save the Earth.” Will he grow up to be a climate alarmist or radical leftist? The truth is that major organizations like the United Nations (UN) and World Economic Forum (WEC) and leftist billionaires like Bill Gates and George Soros are pushing ideologies like new world orders, mass vaccinations, and overpopulation. This leaves impressionable young people, especially those who’ve had economic difficulties growing up, vulnerable to these ideologies. These organizations use young people with difficult upbringings to their advantage, making them believe the future will be bright and shiny and everybody will be the same. What is more provocative to a young person than “everyone will be wealthy, healthy, happy, and carefree?” Everybody will have a house that is exactly alike so that nobody will be better or worse than their neighbor. Everybody will drive the same EV and eat the same amount and quality of food; nobody will ever be sad, depressed, or oppressed. After all, “You will own nothing and be happy.” Sounds great, right? Wrong.
I came across an article that scientifically annihilates the climate change narrative but before we get to that, let’s return to 5th-grade science class on Earth Day. According to eos.org and my local natural history museum, during the age of the dinosaurs the Earth’s climate was hotter, more humid, and “virtually devoid of ice.” Earth was full of volcanic activity and totally unpredictable. Then the climate changed, and the most recent Ice Age, known as the Pleistocene Epoch, arrived. By simply referring back to 5th-grade science class, we can see by these two examples that the Earth has been in and out of climate change without human causation for eons. Of course, the climate during the age of the dinosaurs and the Pleistocene Epoch has shifted over thousands, if not millions of years. The radical left compares today’s data with their “predictive models” and proclaims the Earth’s climate is changing “quicker” than ever before. They scream that life as we know it is at stake! But is that, in fact, true? Here lies the debunking article.
This Guardian article speaks about so-called “hunger stones,” which have recently been unearthed in Europe due to a recent drought. Now, take aside the Guardian’s climate change propaganda and let’s look at the facts. These “hunger stones” have the phrase Wenn du mich siehst, dann weine, “If you see me, then weep,” engraved on them, expressing drought, famine, and inflation related to previous periods of climate change. The article also says the earliest recordings on hunger stones are as recent as 1616 AD. This means that in the year 1616, authors engraved the stones with the teaching of climate-related hardships, completely debunking the theory that human-made “climate change” is warming the world faster. The water clearly receded a mere 406 years ago and then filled again, hiding the engravings until this year, just in time to prove my point. For the simple-minded, this means that the ebbs and flows of drought and climate change have persisted throughout history, and there’s nothing to be alarmed about then or now.
Perhaps a more realistic cause of rapid climate change may be that the Earth’s magnetic poles may be shifting, known as a geomagnetic reversal. While this may seem like an issue of alarm, the poles have shifted before. According to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the pole shift is not the cause of climate change. However, we know that NASA is a government-funded agency and an “agenda contributor” to the World Economic Forum.
Therefore, NASA’s statements cannot be considered legitimate without considering the conflicts of interest at play. It isn’t known what would happen to humanity and life on Earth if a geomagnetic reversal happened. According to inverse.com, the last reversal occurred about 780,000 years ago. A geomagnetic reversal would affect our satellites, GPS, and compass navigation, as well as some animal migration, which is detrimental to life on Earth. The question of whether it would lead to mass extinction is unknown. Luckily, these reversals happen over thousands, if not millions of years, and none of us will be around to witness it.
If the radical left has nothing (theoretically or financially) to gain by pushing the EV/climate change narrative, then what is this all about? Simply put, I believe it’s about control. Look at California as a guide for the future of liberal-run America. California recently passed a measure to ban all sales of gas-fueled vehicles by the year 2035. Yet, they also asked residents to avoid charging their EVs due to power grid constraints. In other words, if the power grid cannot sustain the current EVs along with the demand to power homes and air conditioning, how would it handle a state with 39 million people driving EVs and powering basic necessities? The answer is that it wouldn’t handle it. Even big Conservative states like Texas have issues with the power grids during heat waves, yet this administration is pushing even MORE strain by mandating EVs and so-called renewable energy.
Quite simply, if every American has an electric mode of transportation or EV, it is too easy for the US government to stop the ability of Americans to move around their communities and the country. If the American people cannot mobilize, they cannot fight a dictatorship. Fear of climate catastrophe is the perfect opportunity for the tyrannical left to bestow compliance on Americans. Manipulating and pushing Americans to purchase EVs and transition into “clean energy.” Once compliance is adequate, the dictatorship ensues, and America as we know it is gone. Because, after all, once they control the power grid, “heating, cooling, transportation, and cooking,” they control everything.
Discussion about this post